Share this!

Closing arguments were heard Thursday in the Nunavut Court of Justice in Iqaluit into allegations of assault against a former RCMP officer in Pond Inlet, Nunavut. (Nick Murray/CBC) The four-day trial of a former Nunavut RCMP officer charged with assaulting a prisoner with a weapon in Pond Inlet in 2015 wrapped up Thursday at the Nunavut Court of Justice.

Lawyers presented closing arguments before Justice Sue Cooper in Paul Marenchuk’s judge-alone trial, which began with the accused facing two assault charges but ended with only one charge remaining.

“The issue here is whether my client was in compliance with section 25 [of the Criminal Code of Canada],” said defence lawyer Alison Crowe.

Marenchuk, a 30-year veteran of the force, sat beside Crowe at the defence table, wearing a dark grey suit and thick square glasses.

Section 25, often used in defence of police charged with assaulting prisoners, states peace officers are justified in using “as much force as is necessary” while carrying out their duties. Use of pepper spray in question

The force Marenchuk used when he pepper sprayed Lanny Kippomee in the Pond Inlet detachment on Sept. 10, 2015 was necessary and proper, argued Crowe.

But Manon Lapointe, Crown counsel from Ottawa, argued the force was excessive: Kippomee had not been combative and was lying on the cell floor when Marenchuk pepper sprayed him.

According to the court record, Marenchuk was detachment commander in Pond Inlet from 2012 until October 2015.

On the night of the alleged assault, two other officers were called to Kippomee’s home, who Crowe said was “intoxicated, angry, suicidal and potentially homicidal.”

At the detachment, the arresting officers placed Kippomee in a cell and removed his outer clothing because they deemed him a suicide risk, the court heard.

When Marenchuk arrived at the detachment, he became “extremely concerned” that Kippomee was still wearing his underwear.

Crowe said her client feared the underwear could be a safety risk to a suicidal inmate, and could hide contraband.

“The two other officers tried to gain compliance and remove Mr. Kippomee’s underwear for a good 30 minutes. When force isn’t effective, greater force is allowed,” she said.

Marenchuk used a “short burst” of pepper spray, added the defence lawyer. One charge dropped on first day of trial

Crowe called the investigation into Marenchuk’s alleged misconduct “very, very sloppy.”

The second assault with a weapon charge Marenchuk faced was dropped on the first day of trial, because another officer came forward to take responsibility.Marenchuk had been charged for allegedly using pepper spray unnecessarily on Joshua Enookolo on Aug. 31, 2015.But Const. Patrick Higgins, the sole arresting officer of Enookolo, testified that he used pepper spray on Enookolo, and Marenchuk was not involved.”In light of the evidence … the Crown would like to enter a stay of proceedings on count number one,” said Lapointe.”How did the Crown not know about this?” asked Crowe during her closing arguments. ‘Emotionally upset’ The prosecutor painted a different picture of Marenchuk’s involvement with Kippomee.The arresting officers testified that Kippomee was “never aggressive or combative towards them” and instead was “emotionally upset,” said Lapointe.There was no need to quickly remove Kippomee’s clothes, and no other calls coming into the detachment, said the prosecutor.When one arresting officer, Greg Sutherland, left the cell area to get a suicide-proof gown, he left the cell door open — proof that Kippomee was not a threat to anyone, said Lapointe.But when Marenchuk arrived, the commanding officer admitted to being “irritated” and made “derogatory comments about Kippomee and his family,” the court heard.”Mr. Marenchuk took matters into his own hands because he thought Mr. Kippomee was not being compliant, and he wanted to make […]

(Visited 14 times, 1 visits today)

Share this!