Share this!

A University of Saskatchewan law professor says while the criminal process in the Gerald Stanley trial is over, it’s important to keep the conversation going to determine what can be learned from the case.

A Battleford Court of Queen’s Bench jury acquitted Stanley on Feb. 9 in the 2016 shooting death of Colten Boushie. Assistant Deputy Attorney General Anthony Gerein, the head of the Ministry of Justice’s public prosecutions office, announced Wednesday the Crown will not appeal the jury’s decision.

Misinformation circulating Defence attorney Scott Spencer, left, and his client Gerald Stanley enter the Court of Queen’s Bench in Battleford, Sask., on Monday, Feb. 5, 2018, on the fifth day of the evidence at Stanley’s trial. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Liam Richards Debbie Baptiste holds up a photo of her son Colten Boushie, as the family spoke to reporters in the Foyer of the House of Commons after a day of meetings on Parliament Hill, in Ottawa on Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2018. (Justin Tang / THE CANADIAN PRESS) University of Saskatchewan law professor Glen Luther speaks to CTV Saskatoon’s Angelina Irinici. (Chad Hills/CTV Saskatoon) Saskatchewan Trial Lawyers Association President Nicholas Stooshinoff speaks to CTV Saskatoon. Saskatchewan Trial Lawyers Association President Nicholas Stooshinoff says the numerous false pieces of information circulating about the case are a “prescription” for distress and conflict in society.

There are allegations Colten Boushie was in a gang, for example. A photo of a man with gang affiliation, who isn’t Boushie, is making its rounds online. However, there is no evidence to show Boushie was in a gang.

Another example: there are statements Stanley was arrested then sent home before being interviewed by RCMP. A court document from the case states Stanley was arrested for murder on Aug. 9 at 6:53 p.m., slept in cells, and was interviewed around 1:42 the following afternoon.

University of Saskatchewan law professor Glen Luther says the conversation should instead be about what can be learned from the case.

“Changing the facts or saying something else is not going to change that result. It’s talking, I guess, about the wrong thing,” he says. “How do we do better next time? How does the justice system improve itself going forward? How do the police improve themselves going forward?”

Law professor calls for jury reform

Luther says the case proves change is necessary within the justice system. He says he would like to see a more transparent jury selection process and more Indigenous representation on jury pools and panels. He says without Indigenous people on the jury there can be a perception of bias.

“It’s not just about the Boushie case. It’s about Saskatchewan,” he says. “It’s about the issues that we have to face going forward. And if we can use this case as a flashpoint for change, then so much for the better.”

He also says there’s a concern from landowners about rural crime that needs to be addressed and questions as to whether RCMP are properly equipped to police rural Saskatchewan.

Luther says it’s all part of a bigger push toward restorative justice and to work toward lowering the Indigenous incarceration rate in Saskatchewan.

He says the verdict struck a chord with him personally and caused him to rethink what he’s done in his legal career. He’s now urging others who work in the legal system to think about the profession.

“It’s difficult to criticize your own but at some point it becomes a real issue,” he says. “It’s time for careful thought and rethinking of how we practice and what we do.”

Lawyer hesitant to see change

Stooshinoff says he’d be reluctant to see changes made to the justice system without […]

(Visited 8 times, 2 visits today)

Share this!